In laws, rhetoric and acts of violence, Europe is rewriting dark chapters of its past
BERLIN —
In Poland, the president signs a law criminalizing anyone who dares
suggest that the country’s citizens helped perpetrate crimes of the
Holocaust.
In Italy, a Mussolini-admiring neo-fascist goes on a shooting rampage targeting people with dark skin.
And
from Hungary to Britain, leading government figures and their allies
promote dark theories about a Jewish financier plotting to subvert the
national will.
After President Trump in August blamed “both sides” for violence in Charlottesville
during dueling protests by white supremacists and their opponents,
critics pointed to American historical amnesia as a contributing
factor.
Europe, with its emphasis on
remembrance in the service of “never again,” was held up as a superior
model for reckoning with the horrors of the past.
But
six months later, events across the continent have served as a potent
reminder that Europe’s grip on its history is far from assured. In
particular, the 20th century’s dark detours into Nazism, fascism and
state-sponsored anti-Semitism are again being subjected to revision.
“You’re
getting the rewriting of history in the extreme,” said Deborah
Lipstadt, an Emory University professor who has written extensively on
Holocaust remembrance and denial.
The
evidence across Europe in recent weeks has been disparate and scattered,
ranging from blatant acts of violence to subtle insinuation and casual
omissions.
The reasons, too, are varied: A
revival of nationalism. A surge in prejudiced thinking about and
behavior toward minorities. A social media culture that spreads
information and disinformation alike with startling speed.
And then there’s the American president himself.
“I
don’t blame it all on Trump,” Lipstadt said. “But what Trump has done
is given a green light, a dog whistle to those who would rewrite
history, who would use that history as a tool.”
That
is certainly what Poland’s critics saw that nation doing when its
lawmakers chose to push ahead — on the eve of Holocaust Remembrance Day,
no less — with a bill that would make it illegal to say the Polish
government or its citizens abetted Nazi crimes.
Poland’s
nationalist leaders saw the legislation as a chance to correct what
they regard as a historical slur: the use of the term “Polish death
camps,” as well as other suggestions of Polish culpability.
Unlike other
European countries, Poland had no collaborationist government. About 6
million of its citizens died during World War II, half of them Jews,
reinforcing Poland’s view of itself as a victim, not a perpetrator.
The
legislation, said Franziska Exeler, a historian at Berlin’s Free
University, reflects the desire of the Polish leadership to make “the
official narratives of World War II less complex than historical
reality. Less messy and more heroic.”
In
Poland in particular, as in much of Eastern Europe, historical
revisionism is far from a new phenomenon. During decades of postwar
communist rule, history was distorted freely for any number of political
ends. For some, the new “Holocaust law” harks back to those times, when
ideology often dictated history.
But the facts are the facts. Historians have documented anti-Semitic atrocities carried out by Polish citizens.
The
law, which theoretically could criminalize researchers or survivors who
point to Polish complicity, was condemned by Israeli leaders as
amounting to Holocaust denial.
The Trump
administration, which had previously praised Poland’s nationalist
agenda, added its own sharply worded rebuke. But there was also a
reaction in the other direction — an outpouring of prejudice toward
Jews.
“The idea of the bill was not
anti-Semitic in and of itself. They wanted to show their electorate that
Poland has risen from its knees, and won’t be humiliated,” said Adam
Michnik, a Polish journalist and historian who is editor in chief of
Gazeta Wyzborca, Poland’s largest newspaper. “But the anti-Semitic
hatred that this has dredged up, on the Internet and on social media, I
don’t remember anything like it since 1968.”
That
year, an anti-Jewish campaign by the communist government prompted the
eventual departure of at least 13,000 Jewish Poles and Poles with Jewish
roots — a reminder that old hatreds survived the war and have surfaced
regularly in Europe in the decades since.
But
the degree to which politicians are now stoking racial and religious
prejudices — and legitimizing views long considered verboten — is
exceptional in recent years, experts say.
An anti-immigrant party in Austria whose leaders have neo-Nazi roots recently joined the government. About the same time, a far-right party entered the German Parliament for the first time in more than half a century.
In
Italy, meanwhile, far-right parties stand a chance of capturing the
government in March elections alongside a more mainstream right-wing
party. All advocate deporting hundreds of thousands of migrants.
The
political atmosphere, said Noemi Di Segni, head of the Union of Italian
Jewish Communities, is rife with “very intensive signs of return to
neo-fascism.”
With the heated rhetoric has come a spike in violence.
A onetime local candidate for Italy’s far-right Northern League — one of the parties in line to govern — went on a shooting rampage this month
in the central Italian hilltop city of Macerata. He wounded six African
immigrants, one of whom sat in his hospital bed two days after a bullet
passed through his lung and said he had never heard of Benito Mussolini
or the Italian dictator’s fascist creed.
But
the shooter, who has boasted in court of his crimes, was well aware. He
sported a facial tattoo associated with the extreme right, owned a copy
of Hitler’s anti-Semitic manifesto, “Mein Kampf,” and delivered a
fascist salute from the city’s Mussolini-era war memorial just before
his arrest.
The shooting was condemned
by mainstream politicians, and by thousands who marched in Macerata last
week against racially motivated violence.
But
the shooter, 28-year-old Luca Traini, was also cheered, receiving a
level of support that disturbed even his lawyer. “Politically, there’s a
problem. In Macerata, people stop me to give messages of solidarity
with Luca,” the lawyer, Giancarlo Giulianelli, told reporters. “It’s
alarming, but it gives us a sense of what is happening.”
So,
too, does the campaign against the 87-year-old Hungarian American
billionaire George Soros. Long a favorite boogeyman of the far right in
Europe and the United States, Soros has been invoked even more than
usual lately in attacks that critics see as an anti-Semitic trope.
In the Czech Republic’s presidential election
late last month, pro-Western candidate Jiri Drahos was alleged in
online propaganda to be part of a Soros-led cabal seeking to open the
country to unchecked immigration.
In
Hungary, Prime Minister Viktor Orban has gone further, launching
legislation aimed at cracking down on civil society groups and dubbing
it the “Stop Soros” bill. With elections due in April, Orban has
campaigned more aggressively against the financier than he has against
his political opposition.
In Britain, Prime Minister Theresa May’s former chief of staff, Nick Timothy, recently raised eyebrows
with a front-page story in the Daily Telegraph alleging a secret Soros
plot to stop Brexit. Soros has never hidden his opposition to
Britain’s departure from the European Union.
The
trend toward what critics see as a dangerous acceptance of bias
also has infiltrated the cultural sphere. In France — where Marine Le
Pen, the daughter and political heir of a convicted Holocaust denier,
placed second in last year’s presidential vote — the recent revelation
that the Culture Ministry had included the anti-Semitic
writer Charles Maurras in a series of annual books commemorating key
figures and anniversaries in French history set off a backlash.
Historians
on the committee that drew up this year’s list insisted that
commemorating Maurras was not the same as celebrating him. But the text
of his entry conspicuously omitted the words “racist” and
“anti-Semite.”
Neighboring
Germany, as the country with the most to atone for historically, has
long been hyper-aware of the potential damage from such an oversight.
Instruction
about the Holocaust is at the core of the nation’s education system,
and the capital, Berlin, is full of reminders of Nazi-perpetrated
horrors — from the small brass “stumbling stones” that commemorate
individual victims to the chilling Topography of Terror museum, which
traces the rise of the Nazis on ground once occupied by the Gestapo and
SS.
Yet even in Germany, the anti-Muslim
far right is growing. Protests against Israel in December, meanwhile,
stoked fears that the country has an anti-Semitism problem among its
Muslim immigrants.
The irony, said
Andreas Nachama, director of Topography of Terror, is that Jews, Muslims
and other minority groups “all sit in the same boat, even though they
don’t see it that way.” He added: “We should not get accustomed to
violence against minorities, whoever the minority is.”
The
story his museum tells is one of individual groups being singled out
for discrimination, and ultimately persecuted by a state that uses
prejudice as an excuse to abandon the rule of law. It’s a lesson of
history, he said, that has to be learned to understand the value of
liberal democracy.
“You don’t just have
freedom. You have to win it and fight for it every day,” said Nachama, a
historian and a rabbi. “You have to speak problems out loud, and don’t
take anything for granted.”
McAuley reported from Paris and Warsaw. Beck reported from Berlin. Michael Birnbaum in Rome contributed to this report.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Observação: somente um membro deste blog pode postar um comentário.