Brazilian court upholds corruption conviction of former president Lula, potentially ending his political career
The justices indicated they would stop short of the politically charged step of jailing the leftist icon as he continues his legal fight. But for the 72-year-old known simply as “Lula,” the 3-0 ruling poses potentially career-ending obstacles.
Brazil’s poverty-busting president from 2003 to 2011 has emerged as the
early front-runner in this year’s presidential race. He is the left’s
best chance against a field of candidates including his closest rival, a
far-right firebrand known for misogynistic comments. But Brazil’s “clean record law” bars politicians with convictions upheld on appeal from running for office.
A defiant Lula proclaimed his innocence after the ruling and promised to fight on. “No heads down. Heads high. . . . Never give up,” he told supporters in Sao Paulo. “I want to warn the Brazilian elite: Just wait because we will be back,” he added.
Linked to a massive corruption probe known as “Operation Car Wash,” Lula was convicted of receiving bribes worth more than $1 million, mostly in the form of a refurbished beachfront apartment. He can still appeal to higher courts. But Wednesday’s outcome suggested a protracted legal battle ahead in which Lula’s eligibility to run might not be fully determined until as late as September — a month before the elections.
But Lula’s Workers’ Party has pledged to stick by his candidacy no matter what. His ardent
supporters immediately denounced the decision as a politically motivated gambit and burned tires on streets here and in Sao Paulo, Brazil’s largest city.
His backers built a small tent city here ahead of the verdict, complete with makeshift stores and restaurants. Earlier Wednesday, they marched as close as they could get to the courthouse, but huge lines of police officers on horseback held them back. After the decision, and amid a driving rain in Porto Alegre, dejected supporters packed buses en route to their homes.
“I’m frustrated and sad, but the fight is much bigger than this,” said Ronaldo Soares, 41, a trainee chef who traveled 3½ days by bus to rally for Lula. “A new dictatorship is starting in Brazil. It’s a class fight. The rich and elite, the market forces, big business is in charge of everything. This is a big step back for the workers, but we need to step up and fight for Lula because he represents democracy.”
Demonstrators against Lula, meanwhile, celebrated in the streets, hailing the verdict as a sign that the rule of law was being upheld.
“All the mechanisms to guarantee impunity in public officials were put in place to try and protect Lula,” said Iria Cabrera, organizer of an anti-Lula demonstration in Porto Alegre. “And if this person can see justice, you open a path to have people pay for their crimes, any person on any level.”
Lula’s 2017 conviction stems from allegations he accepted the remodeled beachfront pad in a middle-class resort from a construction firm in return for public contracts. Wednesday’s unanimous decision leaves Lula with two remaining appeals, including to Brazil’s supreme court. However, Lula can also apply to an electoral tribunal for a special exemption to run for president despite the conviction if his appeal drags on.
“One thing that could play to Lula’s advantage is that political considerations are likely to play an increasingly important role in the process,” said Peter Hakim, a senior fellow at the Inter-American Dialogue. “To be sure, the decisions will, for the most part, be made by mostly honest and competent judges. But, like judges in the U.S., they do have political views that affect their reasoning.”
The decision will shape the 2018 presidential race in a nation exhausted by nonstop political scandals.
In October, Brazilian lawmakers blocked a corruption trial against President Michel Temer after concessions to pro-business political factions. Temer took office in 2016 after President Dilma Rousseff was impeached for fiscal abuses. But Temer remains hugely unpopular, with approval ratings as low as 3 percent.
Lula’s “base sees him as a godlike figure,” said Heni Ozi Cukier, a political scientist at ESPM University, also in Sao Paulo. “If Lula is in the election, the election becomes about who can beat Lula. Without Lula, it’s a very open playing field.”
The conviction has amounted to a hard fall from grace for a man who once ranked as Brazil’s best-liked president and who was described by former U.S. president Barack Obama as “the most popular politician on Earth.” He was the nation’s first leader from a poor background — a factory worker who made his way into politics by way of prominent labor unions.
Under his leadership, Brazil’s economy boomed, and 40 million people rose out of poverty as he built an ambitious social safety net called “zero hunger.”
Yet Lula is accused of seven other crimes — including other counts of corruption, influence peddling and illegal campaign financing.
In addition to the beach apartment in the resort of Guaruja, prosecutors say he received an apartment on the outskirts of Sao Paulo and a $4 million plot of land where his charitable institute is located.
Lula and his allies maintain that the charges are all politically motivated. His defense team says he and his wife, Marisa, never owned the beachfront apartment in question and visited the unit only to consider purchasing it.
“This process has been marked by gross violations of due process,” one of Lula’s lawyers, Cristiano Zanin Martins, said this week. “The prosecutors have utilized the press and social networks to try to demonize Lula and try to impede his right to be innocent until proven guilty.”
Yet on Wednesday, the appeals court said witness testimony indicated
that the apartment in question had been reserved for Lula and his wife
and that renovations on it were made at his request. The court took
issue with the defense team’s insistence that the judges were acting as
the political puppets of Lula’s right-wing opponents.
“Just like
what happened with American President Richard Nixon in the Watergate
case . . . we now see [that] the law is for everyone,” said Justice
Leonardo Paulsen.
Read more
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Observação: somente um membro deste blog pode postar um comentário.